Better, of course, to open just the passage of the audio file used in Reaper's item no problem for Reaper, too, just execute right-click and choose "open copy in.", and the audio file's part which is used by the item is opened as a file segment copy made by Reaper, so you restrict the external editing to the boundaries of the item which is in use (and leave the original audio file intact). the audio file on which that item is based) opens in the external editor. But right-clicking and opening is possible in Reaper, this is exactly how I apply the mentioned Adobe Audition editing: right-click on an item in Reaper, and command "Open in Audition" (or whatever editor you have specified in Reaper's preferences), and then that item (i.e. So it is sort of comparable to Reaper's MonitorFX section, suitable to check the VST plugs within normal playback.ĮddieXx, you are completely right, it would be nice if one could have done the editing directly within a DAW. W/X/Y horizontal Ambisonics) Audition can open and edit those files, iZotope RX cannot!īy the way, if I don't misunderstand your point, Audition should also be able to meet your needs for realtime playback VST: Audition has a section called "EffectsRack", whose VST entries are not processed when saving the file editing. Today, I use Audition for some special tasks, especially most of my spectral cleaning tasks it's very handy to be able to do that from within the Reaper editing (by opening a Reaper "item" in Audition as external editor) even if the file to be edited is a 3-channel file (e.g. You can't do serious classical music editing without a powerful crossfade editor, and even Reaper's leaves one or two functions to wish for being added.īut as an audio editor, well, Wavelab is certainly nice, as far as I remember. ![]() But Steinberg refused that on my request whether one could hope for this feature being added. So I'm not informed about the current version of WL, but at that time which I am speaking of WL to my mind could have been a really nice multitracker, if only they would have added a crossfade editor (as one has in Reaper (or else Sequoia, Nuendo) which is my DAW software now). ![]() I have "given up" on Wavelab years ago, by which I mean I stopped hoping for Steinberg completing WL as a DAW software suitable for my needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |